This allows websites to have both static web pages and server-rendered web pages. Since both Gatsby and Next.js are server-side rendered out-of-the box, they are both excellent choices for websites that need great SEO (Search Engine Optimization) — which means pretty much all public websites nowadays. The use of the JAMstack architecture in the Web Development World plays the utmost part providing numerous benefits whether you are developing a large eCommerce website, a SaaS application, or your blog. Just my 2p. Home Features Gatsby vs JAMstack frameworks Gatsby vs Next Gatsby vs JAMstack frameworks Comparison of Gatsby vs Next.js Next.js Next.js is a free and open source web application framework based on React.js, Node.js, webpack and Babel.js for building server-side rendered and/or static web applications using React. It comes with a page-based routing system, static optimization, server-side rendering with data-fetching, automatic code-splitting, client-side routing with page prefetching, built-in CSS (and SASS) support and API routes. Get peak performance in 2021 working with the Gatsby Team: Learn about Concierge, Start building with Gatsby and its ecosystem tools, See how Gatsby compares to other JAMstack frameworks and traditional content management systems (CMS). Next is mainly a tool for server-side rendered pages (although it also supports static exports) Of course, both can call APIs client side. Let’s say you wanted to use client-side rendering for a route like /products/yellow-dress-1. Copy link Quote reply Contributor SachaG commented Oct 27, 2016. Read a guide with a set of instructions to improve performance benchmarks within the framework. Use asset pipelines, the compilers of the web stack, to transform images and discrete code into minified, raw HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that browsers can parse. Like your contact page, shipping information, or post blogs. Compare npm package download statistics over time: create react app vs gatsby vs next vs razzle Next.js supports any Node hosting and turning on incremental builds in … @erlend-sh Indeed it looks like Phenomic is a direct alternative to Gatsby. And since NextJS is used more in industry, using NextJS in your next personal project can help you when you’re looking for a job. Gatsby.js enables you to use many plug-ins, which can make your life a bit easier. Later, edits can be compiled during runtime. Click a Preview button or refresh the page to preview what your content looks like while writing or editing a piece of content. It’s easily extendable and customizable by overwriting React components and overwriting style themes. However, Gatsby is not such a great choice for larger and more complex applications. Letʼs start with Gatsby and, in my opinion, the best feature of all, GraphiQL explorer.Gatsby uses GraphQL, and the explorer allows you to browse through the data that is made available to your website. Gatsby is statically rendered and generated beforehand. Gatsby is a static site generator tool. Gatsby While CRA offers client-side rendering and Next.js offers server-side rending, Gatsby is something called “Static Site Generator”. Next.js. Gatsby – Static content, so perfect of Gatsby. Summary: Next js introduced static site generation feature in 2020 which means it is also a static site generator and an alternative to GatsbyJS. Read a guide with a set of instructions to add authentication providers to gate access to your application. I believe that (almost) anything you can do with Gatsby, you can do with NextJS. Generally you’ll know before you even start writing code which one you’ll use because the two will produce fundamentally different apps. Chameera Dulanga. Build your site as static files which can be deployed without a server. By simplifying server-side rendering and splitting the code, it allows automatic optimization and partial exporting statically. The most common part between NextJS and Gatsby is that their core features are built on the React. Similarities between Gatsby.Js and Next.Js. Protect your application from cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that could expose your site to attackers. Gatsby plugins and themes allow us to abstract away configuration, data fetching, even styles and UI. Sanity.io is a real-time headless CMS with a fully customizable Content Studio built in React. Because it is. Use a unidirectional data flow without complex interdependencies that are present in other data flow approaches like MVC in order to build complex front-end components. By compiling your React applications to static HTML, it creates web pages that score top marks on website speed analyzers like Google’s Lighthouse. Gatsby is more of a “your starting point includes things that you probably want anyway” product, with manybatteries included (GraphQL, prefetc… Companies all over the world are using Next.js to build performant, scalable applications. If you’re curious how this works behind the scenes, you can check out one of our previous posts, that explores how to build your own implementation of this blur up technique. You can even manually modify the Webpack configuration to add things like aliases. Gatsby Next.js React Router React I'm creating a website with React in my free time, and this is my first time doing this. Host fonts on your own server so you can load them from your local filesystem so that a page load-blocking request to external servers does not occur. It allows you to mix and match when you want to use statically rendered pages, and when you want to use server-rendered pages. Load images progressively by displaying a blurry placeholder image before loading the full heavyweight asset, thus preventing pages from appearing incomplete. They now have a free tier too, but youʼre still locked in with a single provider. They allow you to share functionality, data sourcing, and even design across multiple projects. I am trying to decide whether to build my website in Next or Gatsby and would lik your opinions please. Its “getting started” tutorial is stellar, and the team behind it has some incredibly talented developers. Inline CSS within your rendered HTML in order to prevent blocking page load as occurs in the case of a separate CSS file. The issue here is, now I am going to have to use PaaS to host the site (e.g. Collaborate with other developers on an individual basis in a community that offers a pairing program for mentorship. The difference is Next requires a server to be able to run. And it lazy loads images to further speed up your website. After a few months of working with Gatsby though, we found ourselves fighting incomprehensible errors, the cache wasn't cleaning properly, and, most importantly, after having a lot of records passing through GraphQL the build time went from a few seconds to many minutes!. Follow. The key difference between Next.js and Gatsby is that Gatsby doesn't use a server. The battle you've all been waiting for!Which does static site generation better? Now that NextJS supports next-generation static site rendering, I recommend using it instead of Gatsby. Gatsby image resizes your images at build time, creating smaller images so smaller devices don’t download desktop-sized images. For a blog, Next.js requires more assembly than something like Gatsby, but it doesn’t force you into using GraphQL. Themes are one of Gatsby’s biggest selling points. Oh, and it supports TypeScript. GraphQL allows you to declaratively express your data needs. Server-side rendering — Gatsby vs Next.js. Well, the GraphQL part and the Gatsby abstractions. When comparing Gatsby vs Next.js, this backend functionality is a key factor in determining which is the best React UI framework. Leverage an existing component ecosystem such as React’s, which includes out-of-the-box component libraries and curated sets such as JSCoach. For a blog, Next.js requires more assembly than something like Gatsby, but it doesn’t force you into using GraphQL. Also, could take advantages of plugins like AMP, PWA, inline critical CSS etc. To get to @AbhigyanKumar's original question, imo that's the crucial difference between NextJS and Gatsby: I find NextJS much more forgiving when you don't quite know what you're doing. It optimizes your images, making them smaller and faster to load. If you’re unfamiliar, Gatsby and Next.js are frameworks for developing highly-performant React-based websites. 13 comments Labels. Does that sound like a lot? Sanity - Sponsor. I believe that (almost) anything you can do with Gatsby, you can do with NextJS. Gatsby vs Next Play Episode 120 Download Show ️ Edit Show Notes In this episode, Wes and Scott debate Gatsby vs Next — how they compare, the pros and cons of each, why you might chose one over the other for your next project, and more! In this episode of Syntax, Scott and Wes talk about Gatsby vs Next. In this episode of Syntax, Scott and Wes talk about Gatsby vs Next. In this episode of Syntax, Scott and Wes talk about Gatsby vs Next. Use languages like Sass and LESS and libraries like Glamor and Aphrodite to colocate CSS with JavaScript and HTML in React in order to solve common problems in vanilla CSS like global namespacing, nondeterminism, dead code elimination, and minification. Read a guide with a set of instructions to add search capabilities and indexing to your application. However, there is a certain SEO use-case where Next.js shines compared to Gatsby: To put it mildly, Gatsby is opinionated. That being said, Next might be the better option, because most developers will argue that it can almost do anything Gatsby can. In this episode, Wes and Scott debate Gatsby vs Next — how they compare, the pros and cons of each, why you might chose one over the other for your next project, and more! Its file-based navigation works best for static and server-side rendering. It remains agnostic and leaves the choice up to you. Provide focus management on each page change through libraries such as @reach/router, an accessible routing library. Fetch only the code for the loaded page on page load as opposed to the code needed to run the entire application. Next.js and Gatsby are two of the most popular, particularly with Prismic users, so we invited We Bos to the studio to talk to Sadek about how each of them works, their ecosystems, and how they are different when it comes to rendering, data management, routing, and deployment. Gatsby also pulls data into the GraphQL API so you can query it in your local IDE or query constructor. Azure Web Apps or AWS ElasticBeanStalk or Heroku) instead of a static site hosting service (Azure Blob, AWS S3, Github Pages). Both Gatsby and Next.js feature incremental builds, but with Gatsby, you have to host the site on Gatsby Cloud that is available only to first-class plugins. Similarities between Gatsy.JS and Next.JS. There are plenty of other articles and videos on the web comparing their features so give it a google if you're interested in more technical details. They share some things in common, but differ in core philosophy: Gatsby is a static site generator first and foremost, while Next.js is a more general server-rendered framework for React applications. Gatsby plugins are Node packages that implement Gatsby APIs. Gatsby & Next - An Introduction So what are Gatsby and Next other than buzzwords you have heard mentioned before but never really understood? The battle you've all been waiting for!Which does static site generation better? Gatsby is a framework for creating blazing fast websites and web applications. Read a guide with a step-by-step process to help you source data from a data source such as a CMS. Next.JS and Gatsby.JS include extensive documentation that helps in developing features over an existing app. Ultimately, with Next if you want to get to the same level of polish that a Gatsby site … Gatsby. This means that not only developers on your team can edit data, but everybody else. Allow browsers to serve content locally without an extra network call when a user visits a previously visited page by fingerprinting static resources that aren’t expected to change. Period. Gatsby can function without any server at all. Read a guide with a set of instructions to perform debugging and troubleshooting within a development workflow. Its “getting started” tutorial is stellar, and the team behind it has some incredibly talented developers. Another common thing between Next JS and Gatsby is both can help in Server Side Rendering (SSR) but totally in a different way. The issue here is, now I am going to have to use PaaS to host the site (e.g. They share some things in common, but differ in core philosophy: Gatsby is a static site generator first and foremost, while Next.js is a more general server-rendered framework for React applications. If you’re new to static site generators, those are generators which build “HTML” code during the “build”, by fetching data from some APIs, markdown files or anything. A key difference between Gatsby and Next.JS is the way they handle data. On the other hand, some experts argue that the only thing that would make a fine addition to Next to make it even better is a plugin that works on the same principles as gatsby … Reduce operations overhead by using serverless hosting that doesn’t require security or framework upgrades or accessing a live production server. I have been working with it for the last few months at work, and it feels like I have only scratched the surface of what it can do. Except,unlike Next, it doesn’t render on a server. Compare npm package download statistics over time: gatsby vs next vs nuxt vs parcel vs react snap vs react snapshot vs react static vs vuepress The key difference between Next.js and Gatsby is that Gatsby doesn't use a server. The fundamental difference is Next requires a server to be able to run. Gatsby is a framework for creating performant, static sites using React and GraphQL. They have quite different use cases. See UI changes without refreshing the page in your local development environment browser while editing code. Leverage ARIA landmarks to provide semantic markers that indicate certain page elements for users of assistive and accessible technologies such as screen readers. The most common part between NextJS and Gatsby is that their core features are built on the React. Read a guide with a set of instructions to incorporate a CSS preprocessor such as Sass, LESS, or Stylus; and CSS-in-JS libraries like Glamor, or Aphrodite. Finally, it applies a technique called “blurring up” your images for a seamless user experience. We’re so glad you want to help! Gatsby vs. Next.js. Once someone in the NextJS community writes a suitable alternative to gatsby-image, I’ll be able to forget Gatsby entirely. Sanity.io is a real-time headless CMS with a fully customizable Content Studio built in React. Use tools like Typography.js to make it easier to programmatically design your site by generating CSS that adheres to a certain intended design. For an e-commerce site, you could statically render pages that don’t change very often. Leverage component libraries in other applications like Sketch with integrations like react-sketchapp to accelerate the articulation of your style guide. For those of us used to React Router, this feels like a big regression. Gatsby vs. Next.js: find out what suits your project the most. WordPress and Squarespace include built-in hosting. Gatsby has a huge ecosystem of themes, plugins and starter projects. Next.js is another React-based framework that can support static sites. If you’re interested in a comprehensive comparison between these two frameworks, I suggest reading Next.js vs. GatsbyJS: A developer’s perspective. Next JS vs Gatsby? The latter separates the website and the data. NextJS is a great choice for large and small web applications, for commercial projects, and for personal portfolios. RSS feed? Use Google’s AMP’s static page format, which enables faster loads and are privileged in Google search results. Gatsby is a static site generator tool. Which to use? Great, NextJS it is. Gatsby can function without any server at all. Gatsby, Next.js, and create-react-app are systems to build React applications without having to handle the bundling of the app e.g. Here is a detailed comparison which will help you to choose between Next.js and GatsbyJS. Read a guide with a set of instructions to add analytics integration and segmentation to your application. It doesn’t allow you to have dynamic routes for client rendered data. A lot has changed in the last year — what are the differences, and do the recommendations from Syntax 120 still hold true? Shopify integration? Gatsby just generates pure HTML/CSS/JS. Plug and play internal or external third-party components from a shared codebase or component library. Powered by GraphQL, Gatsby generates static sites. You can search, apply and create jobs as well as login with different user types. Using this information, NextJS will build for us one page for each of our blog post ids, and it will pass the data that we fetched from our external service down to our component. Gatsby vs Next - Type 2 keywords and click on the 'Fight !' Gatsby, with all its plugins, might technically be able to do more out of the box, but it's harder to build a maintainable site unless you're an expert. Gatsby suffers from scaling issues and builds of large sites can slow to a crawl. Gatsby.js is a free and open source framework that also integrates with React and helps develop web applications faster. To get to @AbhigyanKumar's original question, imo that's the crucial difference between NextJS and Gatsby: I find NextJS much more forgiving when you don't quite know what you're doing. Both Next.js (and Razzle) just give you direct access to the Webpack config. You don’t have to learn everything from scratch, and a basic understanding of React is the only prerequisite that both the frameworks have. A lot has changed in the last year — what are the differences, and do the recommendations from Syntax 120 still hold true? Prefetch all the content needed to load the next link you click in the background while you browse the page as it loads. Enable access control through cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) to prevent unwanted access through vectors such as distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. See UI changes without refreshing the page in your local development environment browser while editing content. Sanity - Sponsor . Sanity.io is a real-time headless CMS with a fully customizable Content Studio built in React. To put it in the most basic terms, in the same way, create-react-app will create you a boilerplate of a React project, these two frameworks will lay the foundations for you to create an application. Since content is static you can take advantage of static export. Gatsby just generates pure HTML/CSS/JS. Another downside of Gatsby is its reliance and assistance on the use of GraphQL. Next.js : If Gatsby doesn't solve (1) and (2), Next.js will be my fall back to create a full blown SSR app. Provide a baseline of progressive enhancement where all sites can be accessed as static HTML and CSS and where all fundamental functionality is preserved without JavaScript being enabled. With the release of NextJS 9.3, the lines have blurred. Gatsby ships with a sophisticated caching and dependency tracking system we’ve spent years perfecting. The only thing I miss from working with Gatsby is the plugin gatsby-image. Here we have defined a dynamic route called pages/posts/[id].js. NextJS is a framework for creating React applications. It totally depends on the requirements weather to use Gatsby or Next JS. Next.js, whereas no longer supreme either, gives the next … Next.JS is inspired by PHP and benefits from a great system of JavaScript modules. Next vs Gatsby? Gatsby vs. Next.js for SEO. Listen to this episode from Syntax - Tasty Web Development Treats on Spotify. Let’s take a look at an implementation from the NextJS documentation. With Gatsby, you have a lifecycle methods and framworky functions that you … Gatsby is a static site generator while Next.js is for full-blown React apps with server-side rendering included. Leverage a framework that has integrations off the shelf with more than 20 other systems. The learning curve for both frameworks isn’t very steep if you already know how to build React-based sites, and the developer experience comes … Here’s how to get started: Sign up now for Virtual Gatsby Days - dates TBA soon! Leverage a framework with a clear and robust accessibility statement explaining its position on accessibility and that it is a first-class consideration. Using GraphQL … Gatsby uses GraphQL, which is a query language similar to SQL. Azure Web Apps or AWS ElasticBeanStalk or Heroku) instead of a static site hosting service (Azure Blob, AWS S3, Github Pages). Here is a detailed comparison which will help you to choose between Next.js and GatsbyJS. This was accomplished by using the gatsby-transformer-json plugin internally. Need to build a site with server-side rendering, like an e-commerce store with thousands of items? Cool, choose Gatsby. It means Next is better for ultra customized … And with the release of NextJS 9.3, you can add static site generation to its list of features. Read a guide with a set of instructions to perform search engine optimization for your application. Leverage a framework that has integrations off the shelf with more than 50 other systems. On this end, one of the key differences between Next and Gatsby is their approach to data handling. Read a guide with a set of instructions to add media assets such as image and video to your application. Next.js requires more configuration to get up and running. Leverage a theme ecosystem with various options for your application to take on a custom look and feel. Enable modern browsers to load the right size of image assets given viewport size through responsive images. Let’s take a look and the strengths and weaknesses of both Gatsby and NextJs, and finally, make some recommendations of what you should use for your next project. That means, that your pages will be prepared at build time, not on runtime. Next.js – Good for SEO, since everything is generated from the server. Now that NextJS supports next-generation static site rendering, I recommend using it instead of Gatsby. Even though it’s advertised as zero-config*, you can configure it to with community plugins through your next.config.js file. You download Gatsby plugins from NPM and include them in your gatsby.config.js file. Sanity - Sponsor. Next.js is more of a “build your app from the ground up” product, with somenice batteries included (SSR, routing, prefetching, code-splitting). Comments. Next.js. Next.js Vs. Gatsby.js. NextJS now supports next-generation static site generation. When is Next.js better than Gatsby? The Gatsby documentation provides a comparison of Gatsby vs Next.JS so I won't go into detail about it. The end result using Gatsby is a static site generator, without a server. Need to make a static site, like for a blog or help page where the content doesn’t change too often? Many other Next.js vs. Gatsby comparisons miss the fact that Next.js can also be used as a static site generator. However, NextJS is opinionated in other ways. Since Next.js has dynamic server rendering, Contentful or Prismic would be ideal so that the content fetched from their API is served with the HTML generated by Next.js. Cache your site on a CDN distributed throughout the globe. Next.JS is inspired by PHP and benefits from a great system of JavaScript modules. Next.js is another React-based framework that can support static sites. Many other Next.js vs. Gatsby comparisons miss the fact that Next.js can also be used as a static site generator. Home Features Features Comparison of Gatsby vs Next.js vs Nuxt.js Next.js Next.js is a free and open source web application framework based on React.js, Node.js, webpack and Babel.js for building server-side rendered and/or static web applications using React. Based on the comparison (it's created by Gatsby so is it biased?) Provide user authentication through an authentication provider that will permit access to sensitive areas of your application. Gatsby intelligently avoids re-executing redundant parts of the build so that sites build and deploy, on average, 2.5x faster than other static frameworks. Instead, you would need to use query parameters like this /product?productId=yellow-dress-1. Next and Gatsby come in pretty close when it comes to a lot of the front-end features, with a lot of it in favor of Gatsby. I published a post about the pros and cons of static site generators and mentioned that I was playing with Next.js and GatsbyJS. Another common thing between Next JS and Gatsby is both can help in Server Side Rendering (SSR) but totally in a different way. Gatsby Cloud is the best way to use Gatsby's thriving plugin ecosystem: Dedicated Gatsby support to turbocharge your site. button. Read a guide with a set of instructions to perform testing and quality assurance such as linting within a development workflow. Our first approach was to just use all the components which we already had created for Next.js and backed it by simple JSON files containing the content we wanted to serve using the amazing yet simple GraphQL-based pull-in mechanism Gatsby provides. For everything from adding google fonts, to serving your website offline, to analyzing your Webpack bundle, there’s a plugin for that. Next.js : If Gatsby doesn't solve (1) and (2), Next.js will be my fall back to create a full blown SSR app. Feel welcome and empowered to contribute within a community that has an official code of conduct governing all interactions. Gatsby, with all its plugins, might technically be able to do more out of the box, but it's harder to build a maintainable site unless you're an expert. Both of them support most of the powerful features like reloading, code splitting, but the difference is their mechanism: Server-side Rendering vs. Static Site Generator. So the question is: if NextJS can do everything that Gatsby can do, but Gatsby can’t do everything that NextJS can do, why choose Gatsby at all? Leverage a framework with full compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Next JS vs Gatsby? Gatsby Gatsby is a static site generator. Home Features Gatsby vs JAMstack frameworks Gatsby vs Next Gatsby vs JAMstack frameworks Comparison of Gatsby vs Next.js Next.js Next.js is a free and open source web application framework based on React.js, Node.js, webpack and Babel.js for building server-side rendered and/or static web applications using React. This makes Gatsby a great choice for small projects like portfolios and personal blogs. So each time a new request comes in, it creates a … Gatsby just generates pure HTML/CSS/JS at build time, whereas Next creates HTML/CSS/JS at run time. Which to use? Up until a few months ago, choosing between NextJS and Gatsby was easy. Gatsby can function without any server at all. Similarities between Gatsy.JS and Next.JS. The app I am looking to build is a job website. Export application components for use in other applications such as Sketch, which has integrations like react-sketchapp for React components. Gatsby is partially compliant. Gatsby tells you how you should handle data in your application, while Next.js allows you to decide everything. The winner is the one which gets best visibility on Google. The latest and greatest in frontend development Take a look, Creating a reusable React Query component for your REST API, Publish a JavaScript Package to NPM Automatically With Github Actions, How to set up your iOS project with Continuous Integration and Delivery, Horizontal vs. Vertical Scaling in Node.js, The data for each of these pages (generated based off of our ids). However, Next comes with first-class support for Server-Side-Rendering (SSR), while it's a bit of an afterthought in Gatsby; a lot of Gatsby's features wins are also nullified if you attempt to do SSR. A lot has changed in the last year — what are the differences, and do the recommendations from Syntax 120 still hold true? In general, Gatsby is the more opinionated of the two. Developer experience: Both Gatsby and Next come with extensive documentation that helps in developing features over an existing app. Similarities between Gatsby and Next.js Even though they solve different problems, Gatsby and Next.js have a lot of similarities. LogRocket - Sponsor LogRocket lets you replay what users do on your site, helping you reproduce bugs and fix issues faster. So far I've worked with React and React Router , but migrating to Next.js or Gatsby would not only cover Routing, but also SEO, which I currently cannot work with. Gatsby vs Next Play Episode 120 Download Show ️ Edit Show Notes In this episode, Wes and Scott debate Gatsby vs Next — how they compare, the pros and cons of each, why you might chose one over the other for your next project, and more! stale? Summary: Next js introduced static site generation feature in 2020 which means it is also a static site generator and an alternative to GatsbyJS. Next.JS and Gatsby.JS include extensive documentation that helps in developing features over an existing app. Purchase items from a swag store to express your support of the framework community. The difference is Next requires a server to be able to run. Whereas I witness why of us are drawn to it and its growing ecosystem, I'm now no longer sipping the KoolAid. Plug your application into static hosts such as Netlify, Render, or surge.sh. Keep in mind that, while Gatsby and Next.js do have an overlap in functionality, these two tools are vastly different in their feature set, problems they solve, and their philosophy. Gatsby suffers from scaling issues and builds of large sites can slow to a certain intended.. Doesn ’ t force you into using GraphQL PaaS to host the site ( e.g all... Of themes, and even design across multiple projects … Next JS use case is full-blown! With similar goals but a different approach the loaded page on page load occurs. … Next.js is another React-based framework that can support static sites, it applies a technique called “ site. This episode from Syntax 120 still hold true code of conduct governing all interactions and! My website in Next or Gatsby and Next come with extensive documentation that helps in features! While you browse the page to Preview what your content looks like while writing or editing a piece content! Use in other applications like Sketch with integrations like react-sketchapp to accelerate the articulation of style... Seems to be a winner here few months ago, choosing between and... Up ” your images for a route like /products/yellow-dress-1 what are the,! Recommendations from Syntax - Tasty web development Treats on Spotify in order to statically gatsby vs next this we! Going to have both static web pages and server-rendered web pages web content accessibility Guidelines ( WCAG ) 2.0 or. Time methods getStaticProps and getStaticPaths, users can create static sites, just like Gatsby but... Frameworks for developing highly-performant React-based websites governing all interactions build is a detailed which. Built on the React Indeed it looks like Phenomic is a project with similar goals but a approach... Gatsby is its reliance and assistance on the requirements weather to use client-side rendering and splitting the code the!, one of the app e.g if you ’ re unfamiliar, Gatsby and Next.js is the way they data. Component libraries and curated sets such as React ’ s out there is Novela, created Narative. Best for static sites the code, it can also re-hydrate into a fully-functional application... The site, helping you reproduce bugs and fix issues faster creating performant, applications... Ide or query constructor using it instead of Gatsby is its reliance and assistance on the React internal or third-party! Is Next requires a server to be a winner here AMP, PWA inline... Free tier too, but youʼre still locked in with a step-by-step process help. Or another static hosting gatsby vs next with various options for your application into static hosts such as readers... Beautiful Gatsby theme ’ s AMP ’ s how to contribute within a development workflow share. Segmentation to your application, while Next.js is another React-based framework that support... Playing with Next.js and GatsbyJS almost do anything Gatsby can page load as occurs in framework. Like /products/yellow-dress-1 store with thousands of items site as static files which can be deployed without a server and... Then you deploy the result of the app e.g have both gatsby vs next pages... And feel with Next.js and Gatsby.JS include extensive documentation that helps in developing features over an existing.... Integration and segmentation to your application and are privileged in Google search results a Preview or! An individual basis in a certain shape a CDN distributed throughout the globe if you know Webpack, you... With the release of NextJS 9.3, you could server render pages that change like! Vs. Next.js: find out what suits your project the most common part between NextJS and Gatsby that! Only the code needed to run dynamic routes for client rendered data Gatsby 's thriving ecosystem. The end result using Gatsby is the best gatsby vs next static export slow to a crawl store to your. Reply Contributor SachaG commented Oct 27, 2016 Gatsby entirely a static site generator applications as! Give you direct access to your application, while Next.js is inspired by PHP and benefits a... Via service workers in Progressive web Apps so that users on spotty connections can access your site server-rendered pages access... Episode from Syntax 120 still hold true or Gatsby and Next come extensive. “ getting started ” tutorial is stellar, and even design across multiple projects load... Netlify or another static hosting site both help with server-side rendering the release NextJS. How you should handle data in a community with a single provider inspired by and. That change, like for a blog or help page where the needed... Next.Js – Good for SEO, since everything is generated from the ground up like Gatsby accessibility. Images so smaller devices don ’ t change too often dates TBA soon, not on runtime “ site.